Research Agenda

My research fields are Political Theory and Comparative Politics. My research interests include Contemporary Political Philosophy, Democracy, Citizenship, International Migration and Open Borders.

My dissertation addresses short-term international movement by theorizing the right to travel. The ethics and politics of international migration have been at the center of academic and political debates over the last few years. Yet while most scholarly attention has focused on long term immigration, the vast majority of cross-border movement of people is short-term. This has resulted in the underdevelopment of normative theory on a more commonly observed phenomenon. My dissertation examines normative justifications of political borders and border controls, the right to travel, and whether liberal democratic states are justified excluding travelers.



Democratic Citizenship

“Democratic Citizenship” In Oxford Bibliographies Online: Political Science. Ed. L. Sandy Maisel. New York: Oxford University Press (2020)

Co-authors: Ugur Altundal and Rick Valelly.

This peer‐reviewed article in Oxford Bibliographies is a reference resource, an annotated bibliography, on democratic citizenship.

The Idea of Individual in Political Liberalism: A Critical Perspective

"The Individual in Political Liberalism: A Critical Perspective,” Journal of Individual and Society. Vol. 7, No. 13 (Spring 2017): 59-78. (In Turkish)

Co-authors: Mehmet Kocaoglu and Ugur Altundal

Abstract: It is difficult to say that there is a consensus on how to situate the individual within a society in liberal theory. The individual is regarded as an agent that looks out for her own personal interest and is a part of the social cooperation in liberal theory. Political liberalism is one of the attempts that tries to place the individual within a society. This paper focuses on how political liberalism places the individual within a society. The purpose of the study is to explain how political liberalism situates the individual as an agent that looks out for her own interest and plays an important role in the social cooperation. Firstly, it  focuses on how the individual and society are placed in political liberalism. Secondly, by taking into consideration the criticism which emphasizes that political liberalism leads to an understanding of the individual as one who is detached from the society, we explore the nature of the relationship that depends on interaction, communication, and cooperation between the individual and society in political liberalism. Thirdly, we discuss the effects of the distinction between public and private spheres on the individual in political liberalism. Lastly, it is argued that political liberalism neither detaches the individual from the society nor fictionalizes the society that ends the autonomy of the individual but rather proctects the autonomy and separateness of individual.

Key Words: Individual, Rights, Liberty, Autonomy, Political Liberalism

Regime Change within Defective Democracies: Turkey in the Early 1990s and 2010s

“Regime Change within Defective Democracies: Turkey in the Early 1990s and 2010s,” Journal of Democracy and Society, 2016, Vol 13., no 1, Pp.10-15.

While democratization studies have been revived after the so-called “third wave” of democratization and “the Arab Spring” recently, the failure of some countries to transition to a functioning democracy has raised important questions. Recent scholarship, accordingly, has mainly focused on understanding “hybrid regimes.” Although some autocratic governments undergo important regime changes, empirical studies demonstrate that they are not necessarily replaced by democratic systems. Such cases help proliferate alternative conceptual studies through a balance between analytic differentiation and conceptual validity. Democracy-with- adjectives, which enables different typologies, is a critical tool to compare and grasp the regime attributes of different cases and/or the regime attributes of the same case across different periods.

By examining the case of Turkey in two periods — 1990s and 2010s—those theoretical distinctions can become meaningful. The tutelary features of the regime in the early years of the republic have almost disappeared in 2010s; however, the “distance to democracy” is still questionable compared to early 1990s. I argue that the decline of the tutelary powers of the military has not led a “more democratic” regime in Turkey. In contrast, it enabled the executive branch to have a privileged position. This unexpected outcome also shows the complexity of political interactions, which requires a more careful political analysis.

Book Review(s)

Altundal, Ugur. “Review of Nazli Avdan’s Visas and Walls: Border Security in the Age of Terrorism (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019), in Political Science Quarterly (forthcoming).